Archive for January, 2009
Arkansas Supreme Court Ignores Argument in Appeal of Lower Court Decision Where Only One Basis for the Lower Court Ruling Was Properly Challenged on Appeal
Posted by: Tasha C. Taylor on January 26, 2009
ArkansasAppeals.com
A blog devoted to information and insight concerning appellate practice in Arkansas
Authors
Tasha C. Taylor
Andrew M. Taylor
- Court of Appeals Oral Argument Scheduled for September 07, 2011Case Style: Manufacturers & Traders Trust Company v. Tracy M. Nickleson, from Faulkner Circuit
- Supreme Court Oral Argument Scheduled for September 08, 2011Case Style: Lemuel Session Whiteside v. State of Arkansas, from Pulaski Circuit, 7th Division. This argument to be conducted at the Old Supreme Courtroom in the State Capitol Building on the Second Floor. There will be no video recording.
- Court of Appeals Oral Argument Scheduled for September 14, 2011Case Style: Terry Richardson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, from Pulaski Circuit, Third Division
- Court of Appeals Oral Argument Scheduled for September 14, 2011Case Style: Kolbrum Elan Vela v. Isak Thor Ragnarsson, from Benton Circuit
- Court of Appeals Oral Argument Scheduled for September 21, 2011Case Style: IC Corporation v. Hoover Treated Wood Products, Inc., from Faulkner Circuit
- Supreme Court Oral Argument Scheduled for September 22, 2011Case Style: Ira Gene Van Kirk v. State of Arkansas, from Greene Circuit
- Court of Appeals Oral Argument Scheduled for September 28, 2011Case Style: Sidney J. Phillippy v. ANB Financial Services, LLC, from Benton County
- Supreme Court Oral Argument Scheduled for September 29, 2011Case Style: Howard W. Curry v. Pope County Equalization Board, from Pope Circuit
- St. Paul withdraws U.S. Supreme Court petition in housing discrimination case By Emily GurnonThe city of St. Paul has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to dismiss its petition to hear its appeal involving landlords who oppose the city's stepped-up housing code enforcement.
- Recent Decisions Eighth CircuitIn a case concerning sanctions for willful violations of court-ordered discovery, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the District Court for the Southern District of Iowa did not err in dismissing the Plaintiff's case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 and ordering that the Plaintiff pay the Defendant $53,255.55 in fees and costs ... (mo […]
- Federal Court to Hear Randeep Mann's Appeal in Bombing CaseA federal appeals court is expected to hear oral arguments Wednesday in the case of a doctor convicted in a 2009 bombing that nearly killed the head of the Arkansas State Medical Board.
